Zach Beauvais

Emotions, intuition, consciousness. Which is the better guide?

by | Mar 26, 2010 | Formspring

Guide to what?

Emotion is for interactions with people and yourself. I feel a certain way, and I have to question why and to what extent. I feel a reaction to or perceive the emotions of another, and I modify my behaviour.

Intuition, I don’t understand completely. I see it almost as an inclination, a set of skills or simply things one has practiced more. I’m intuitively perceptive to rhythm (That’s how I see it, anyway), so I suppose this would be a good guide to specific things, like playing music or creativity. An artist subconsciously guides their medium, intuitively placing and removing and creating and forming. Thinking too hard breaks the instinct.

Consciousness is being aware. Without this, all other perception simply doesn’t exist. It’s like light: no matter how healthy your eyes may be, or how quick your reflexes or tuned your appreciations and intuitions, you cannot see without it. I suppose all other senses feed into this, and it’s up to our minds to sort it, to ponder it, to make decisions.

Related posts

Setting aside Religion?

Setting aside Religion?

I was asked on Formspring.me: "Do you think it's possible for a religious politician to put aside the teachings of their religious institution, and...

read more

What is a Fundamentalist Atheist?

I think the instinct—for lack of a better word—that draws people to act religiously can also affect people with no religion. While there may be no organised creed, there is organisation in a sort of tribal way. This may be in some way related to a …

read more

What is your view on psychics who claim to be able to relay messages from dead relatives?

I don’t believe in it. I don’t know what I think about the afterlife entirely—it’s not something I feel I can know; but everything I have experienced, read and encountered leads me to believe that it’s the end of (at least) communication.

I don’t believe mediums can communicate with the dead, nor that they can receive information from those who have died. I tend to think of them as either showpeople or charlatans, and feel something beyond skepticism. I think it can be dangerous to make such claims, because it plays on the vulnerable and particularly on vulnerable topics. The loss of someone we know is one of our life-story’s saddest parts, and grief often overwhelms judgement: leaving us open to suggestion and trickery.

I think the claim is either nonsensical or despicable, and the people who make it are either vulnerable themselves or preying upon the credulous for control or money.

read more

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *